According to the Distracted Operators Risk Casualties group, an advocacy organization that promotes preventive legal action for distracted driving accidents, the bill, known as “Evan’s Law,” gives law enforcement “implied consent” to have a phone tested at the scene of the crash so a person’s Fourth Amendment rights aren’t violated. In addition, there is no phone data actually being taken.
Several civil liberties groups are skeptical about the bill and whether a prison’s privacy will be violated. This type of technology can very easily be misused, especially since police officers can always obtain call and texting records with timestamps from the phone companies, something that officers rarely do.
Is a “textalyzer” really necessary? Unfortunately, distracted driving has increased over the last few years. In 2011, at least 23 percent of all auto accident involved the use of cell phones at the time of the crash. Texting while driving can make a crash up to 23 times more likely. The biggest problem is with teen drivers – 13 percent of drivers ages 18 to 20 involved in car accidents admitted to texting or talking on their phones at the time of the crash.
So could New Jersey see a similar law soon? Currently there are no plans for textalyzers to be used in the state. But with distracted driving on the rise and if this law passes in New York, something might be coming our way soon.
If you were a victim of a car accident that involved a distracted driver, we’re here to help. Contact the Law Offices of Anthony Carbone now for a free consultation.