Defective Products Causing Injuries in Children

When parents purchase children’s products, they have a right to expect those products are safe when used as indicated and contain sufficient warnings of any inherent risks.

Jersey City injury attorney Anthony Carbone is dedicated to helping those harmed by defective products and other instances of negligence. If you or a loved one suffered injury that may have been caused by a faulty product, please call the Law Offices of Anthony Carbone at 201-963-6000 to schedule your free consultation.

Millions of consumer goods are recalled every year due to design flaws or inadequate safety information, but often not until they have resulted in harm to innocent people. Defective products can be especially dangerous to children.

Types of children’s products that commonly face recall include:

• Cribs
• Highchairs
• Car seats
• Jumpers
• Playpens
• Strollers
• Toys
• Pajamas and other clothing

A good source for parents to monitor recalled children’s items and other products is the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. The CPSC monitors reports of incidents associated with potentially dangerous consumer products and posts notices of recalls.

If you or a family member is injured by a product that you believe may be defective, it’s important to contact a knowledgeable personal injury attorney with experience in product liability cases. Mr. Carbone understands the physical, emotional and financial impacts of injuries caused by negligence, and he is committed to helping injury victims recover the financial security they need.

In the event that you or a loved one is harmed due to the negligence of another, please contact the Law Offices of Anthony Carbone for your free case evaluation. Mr. Carbone welcomes clients from the greater Jersey City and Newark, New Jersey, areas.

Why Children Are Particularly Vulnerable to Defective Product Injuries

Children are not simply small adults. Their bodies are proportioned differently, their developmental stages vary dramatically even within the same age range, and their ability to recognize and respond to danger is limited by age and experience. These realities create specific product safety obligations that manufacturers of children’s goods must account for at the design stage, before a single unit reaches a store shelf.

A crib that is structurally adequate for one sleeping position may create a fatal entrapment hazard if an infant rolls or shifts during sleep. A toy designed for children over three may contain components that pose a choking risk to a two-year-old who receives it as a gift. Car seat hardware that passes laboratory testing may fail to perform as designed in a real-world collision because the crash dynamics were not adequately modeled. These are not theoretical scenarios. They describe documented failures that have been investigated, recalled, and in the most serious cases, litigated in courts across the country.

The physical and developmental vulnerability of children is precisely why federal regulators and courts hold manufacturers of children’s products to a demanding standard. A company that designs, manufactures, or sells products intended for use by children cannot simply satisfy the minimum requirements of an industry standard and call the obligation complete. It must affirmatively consider how the product will be used by children of varying ages, in real household environments, by caregivers who may not read instructions carefully. Foreseeable misuse is part of the safety analysis, not an excuse for it.

The Three Ways a Product Can Be Legally Defective

Product liability law in New Jersey, like most states, recognizes that a product can be defective in three distinct ways, and each requires a different analysis.

A design defect exists when the product’s design itself is inherently dangerous, such that every unit that rolls off the production line presents the same hazard. The defect is baked into the blueprint. A crib with drop-side rails that can disengage from the crib frame under normal use, allowing an infant to become trapped in the gap, is a design defect case. The danger is not unique to one particular crib — it exists in every crib built to that design. Design defect cases often involve expert testimony about alternative designs that would have achieved the product’s intended function without the dangerous feature, and about whether the cost and feasibility of the safer design were within the manufacturer’s reach.

A manufacturing defect exists when the design is sound but a specific unit, or a batch of units, deviates from the design in a way that creates a hazard. A car seat whose harness buckle was assembled with a component that did not meet the product’s own specifications may represent a manufacturing defect even if the overall car seat design is safe. These cases require tracing the specific item involved in the injury through the production process to identify where the deviation occurred and who was responsible for quality control at that stage.

A warning defect, sometimes called a failure to warn, exists when the product itself is reasonably safe but the information accompanying it is inadequate to allow users to make safe choices. A medication that can interact dangerously with common over-the-counter drugs, but whose labeling does not disclose that interaction, may create liability through a failure to warn. For children’s products, warning defects frequently arise from age range specifications that are too broad, hazard warnings that are buried in dense fine print, or pictograms and labels that are not visible or comprehensible to a caregiver using the product in realistic conditions.

What Recalls Mean and What They Do Not Mean

The CPSC recall process that the original content references is an important consumer safety tool, but understanding its limitations matters for anyone trying to evaluate whether a legal claim exists after a child is injured.

A recall is initiated when the CPSC determines that a product presents a substantial risk of injury or death. The determination can come from consumer complaint reports filed with the CPSC, from manufacturer reports of product-related incidents, or from the CPSC’s own investigation of a product category. When a recall is announced, the manufacturer is typically required to offer consumers a remedy, usually a refund, replacement, or repair.

Here is what a recall does not do: it does not compensate families for injuries that have already occurred. It does not extinguish the liability of a manufacturer who designed, made, or sold a product that injured a child. And critically, the absence of a recall does not mean a product is safe or that no legal claim exists. Many product liability cases involve products that were never recalled, either because the injury pattern had not yet been recognized as systemic, because the manufacturer was not forthcoming with incident reports, or because the harm occurred before enough complaints had accumulated to trigger regulatory attention.

For families whose children have been injured, the existence of a recall can actually be powerful supporting evidence in a legal claim. A recall announcement that describes the specific hazard that injured a child is the manufacturer’s own admission that the product was dangerous. Defense attorneys will work to minimize its significance, but it is a meaningful piece of evidence that an experienced attorney will use effectively.

The Supply Chain and Who Can Be Held Responsible

Product liability claims in New Jersey follow the product through the entire supply chain. The manufacturer that designed the product is one potential defendant. But under New Jersey law, liability can also attach to component part manufacturers whose defective components were incorporated into the final product, distributors who placed the product in the stream of commerce, and retail sellers who sold the product to the consumer.

This matters practically because the entity whose name appears on the product’s packaging is not always the entity that exercised the most control over the aspect of the product that caused the harm. A major retailer that sources children’s products from overseas manufacturers and sells them under a house brand may bear responsibility alongside the manufacturer. A company that supplies the hardware components used in a crib’s assembly may be a defendant separate from the crib’s brand name manufacturer.

Identifying the full chain of distribution and the role each party played in bringing the product to market is part of the initial investigation in any product liability case. It requires examining the product itself, the manufacturing records, the importation history if the product was made abroad, the distribution agreements, and the retail relationship. Each of those parties may have its own insurance coverage and its own defense team, which is part of why these cases benefit from early and thorough legal investigation.

The Statute of Limitations and Why Acting Promptly Matters

New Jersey’s statute of limitations for product liability claims is generally two years from the date the injury occurred, or from the date the injured party discovered or should reasonably have discovered the connection between the product and the injury. For injuries to children, the statute of limitations is typically tolled, meaning paused, until the child reaches the age of eighteen, at which point the two-year period begins to run.

The tolling provision for minors does not mean that waiting years to investigate is a good strategy. Evidence deteriorates. The product itself may be discarded, and without the physical product, key evidence about the manufacturing defect or design feature at issue may be lost. Incident reports, manufacturing records, and internal communications at the company may be subject to routine document retention policies that result in their destruction after a set period. A preservation demand issued early in the process, before the company has any reason to know a claim is coming, can prevent that destruction.

What Parents Should Do Immediately After a Child Is Injured by a Product

The steps a family takes in the aftermath of a product injury can significantly affect the strength of a subsequent legal claim. The first and most urgent priority is the child’s medical care, and that means seeking prompt and thorough evaluation even when the injury initially appears minor. Some injuries, including internal trauma and certain types of head injury, do not present their full severity at the scene of the incident.

After medical care is secured, preserving the product is critical. Do not discard the item, even if it is damaged. Do not return it to the retailer, even if the store offers a refund. The physical product is the primary piece of evidence in a defective product case, and its condition at the time of the incident, including any fractures, separations, or mechanical failures, is information that cannot be fully reproduced from photographs alone. Retain all original packaging, any assembly or instruction materials, and the receipt or proof of purchase if available.

Photographing the product, the scene where the injury occurred, and the child’s injuries creates a contemporaneous record that supports the account of what happened. Filing a report with the CPSC through their online reporting system at SaferProducts.gov creates an official record of the incident and may contribute to the agency’s awareness of a product hazard that affects other children.

A New Jersey Personal Injury Attorney who handles product liability cases understands how to work with engineering and safety experts to analyze defective children’s products, how to navigate the relationship between a CPSC recall and a civil claim, and how to build the evidentiary record needed to hold manufacturers and distributors accountable for the harm their products cause.

If you or a family member is injured by a product that you believe may be defective, it’s important to contact a knowledgeable personal injury attorney with experience in product liability cases. Mr. Carbone understands the physical, emotional and financial impacts of injuries caused by negligence, and he is committed to helping injury victims recover the financial security they need. Please contact the Law Offices of Anthony Carbone for your free case evaluation.

Contact Us Today